My Photo
Name:
Location: California, United States

I am a neolibertarian minded individual who feels that freedom and individual rights take precedence over the wants of government. I believe government exists to serve the people and not to protect us from ourselves. I am an advocate for private firearms ownership, smaller government, reduced taxes and freedom to live your life however you choose, providing you do not directly hurt others.

Add to Google ReaderAdd to Bloglines
Add to FeedloungeAdd to Technorati
Add to netvibesAdd to My Yahoo
Add to My MSNAdd to Rojo
Add to NewsgatorAdd to My AOL
Subscribe to FeedAdd to Windows Live

Blogroll Me!


LestDarknessFall.com Libertarian Party (National) Libertarian Party of CA Constitution Party

Declaration of Independence

The U.S. Constitution

Bill of Rights

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report

2004 US DOJ Report Affirming 2nd Amendment Secures Right of Individuals


The Community for Life, Liberty and Property

The Life, Liberty, Property Blogroll

HOMESPUN BLOGGERS

Homespun Bloggers Blogroll


HOMESPUN BLOGGERS

American Flag League Blogroll



Blogs For Borders Blogroll


Screw the UN





Blogs That Link Here


Blogwise - blog directory Bloguniverse - blog directory

Haloscan -Comment Tools

Support this site by ordering great liberty themed books, movies and more! If you can't find what you want, click on the "Powered by Amazon" link in the lower right corner of my store and I'll get a referral fee for your Amazon.com purchases. You can also click this link to go directly to Amazon.com and have your purchases support this site.


Clicking on an item in these menus will take you to an article with that same title.

Self Defense/Foiled Crimes

Illegal Immigration Issues

Firearms/Ban Related Issues

Privacy Related Issues



Open the menu below and select a month and year to view archived posts for that month.




If you enjoy reading, you really must get one of these. I carry mine with me all of the time and read at least 5 books per month on it.




A Feast For Crows
This latest installment of Gearge R. R. Martin's "A Song of Fire and Ice" series isn't quite as gripping as the previous books but is still a pretty good read.


Phantom
Book 10 in the Sword of Truth series continues to keep the reader riveted while repeatedly emphasizing the duty and importance of self defense.


Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed
A follow up to Guns, Germs, and Steel that explains the geographic, environmental and socio-economic reasons that can cause civilizations and communities to collapse.

Mara Belly Dance Lessons Krav Maga Belly Dance
Return to p.i.e.

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Who Should We Blame?

The title link is to a Forbes.com story about the U.S. Supreme court agreeing to decide who is responsible for internet piracy. Major media giants such as Disney, MGM, Time Warner and others want to stick it to the companies that create peer to peer file sharing technology. I very much hope that the Supreme Court does not set a devastating precedent of blaming the file sharing companies for how some people choose to illegally use their software. As far as I'm concerned, the Supreme Court will be deciding if individuals are really responsible for their own actions or if it will be open season on corporations who are unfortunate enough to have some of their consumers act in a criminal manner.

Creators and vendors of file sharing technology in my opinion are doing nothing wrong. Their products are a valid and legal way to freely share non-copyrighted digital files. They do not tell people to infringe on copyrights and they usually package their products with a warning not to violate copyright law. Making them liable for the illegal use of their products is equivalent to making Ford liable for a bank robbery if the robbers use a Ford as their getaway vehicle. A better analogy would be to blame Sony and other companies for selling VCR's, CD Burners and cassette recorders. This same type of thing is tried every year or so when some greedy vicitim wants to collect money from a firearms manufacturer because one of their products was used illegally by a criminal.

Take the following hypothetical example:
Person A gets drunk and smashes Person B's car with a hammer. Is it really ok for Person B to sue the alcohol distillery, the distributor, the bottling plant, the bar that sold person A the drinks and the people who made the hammer? Where would it end? Can Person A also sue everyone involved in making and selling the alcohol that got them drunk and "caused" their lapse of judgment? Would it be proper for Person A to also sue the hammer company because the hammer didn't come with a warning label telling people not to use the hammer after consuming alcoholic beverages?

There are far too many of these cases where people want to hold companies responsible for the criminal actions of individuals. This is wrong and sends a terrible message to society. Go after those who willfully break the law and not those who create and sell products to better our lives and employ our friends and families.

Labels: , ,

|

<< Home