An expression of personal freedom designed to educate people about the meaning and importance of freedom and personal responsibility. Topics will include current events, historical analysis, gun control and firearms rights, education, politics and more. I write in support of freedom lest darkness fall upon our society in the form of dwindling rights, apathy and oppression.
I am a neolibertarian minded individual who feels that freedom and individual rights take precedence over the wants of government. I believe government exists to serve the people and not to protect us from ourselves. I am an advocate for private firearms ownership, smaller government, reduced taxes and freedom to live your life however you choose, providing you do not directly hurt others.
Support this site by ordering great liberty themed books, movies and more! If you can't find what you want, click on the "Powered by Amazon" link in the lower right corner of my store and I'll get a referral fee for your Amazon.com purchases. You can also
click this link to go directly to Amazon.com and have your purchases support this site.
Posts By Category
Clicking on an item in these menus will take you to an article with that same title.
Open the menu below and select a month and year to view archived posts for that month.
You MUST buy a Kindle
If you enjoy reading, you really must get one of these. I carry mine with me all of the time and read at least 5 books per month on it.
Books I Am Reading
A Feast For Crows This latest installment of Gearge R. R. Martin's "A Song of Fire and Ice" series isn't quite as gripping as the previous books but is still a pretty good read.
Phantom Book 10 in the Sword of Truth series continues to keep the reader riveted while repeatedly emphasizing the duty and importance of self defense.
Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed A follow up to Guns, Germs, and Steel that explains the geographic, environmental and socio-economic reasons that can cause civilizations and communities to collapse.
What do you do when the highest court in the land charged with the duty of upholding and defending the constitution betrays that trust? This week, in Roper v. Simmons, the United States Supreme Court has done just that. In a 5 v. 4 ruling, the court declared that it is a violation of the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause of the Eighth Amendment to carry out the death penalty on anyone convicted before the age of 18. This means that 70 people convicted and sentenced to death can no longer be executed because they were under 18 years of age when they were convicted. Sadly, this is not the worst part about this decision. What is horrifying about this decision is that Justice Anthony Kennedy felt that "evolving standards of decency", "a national consensus" and "international opinion" made this decision necessary. 19 of our states allow the death penalty for minors yet he says there is a "consensus" against this! And why the hell does it matter what other countries think when we evaluate the validity of our own domestic laws? Here's a CNN quote from Justice Kennedy:
"It is proper that we acknowledge the overwhelming weight of international opinion against the juvenile death penalty"
This precedent is frightening, and even those who are against the death penalty should be enraged that these pathetic reasons were given for overturning the laws and sentences of 19 U.S. states and a previous Supreme Court ruling. Frankly, if we must model our laws after international opinion, neither our constitution nor our bill of rights would be allowed to exist. France has outlawed religious garb in their schools. China still harasses and punishes churchgoers and priests. Are these valid grounds to challenge the freedom of religion we have always thought was protected by the First Amendment? Should our "Freedom Of Speech" be challenged because of the opinions of Iran, Syria and China? If Kennedy must consult his "WWED: What Would Europe Do?" bracelet before weighing matters of constitutionality and domestic law, he has no business being a Supreme Court Justice.
"When a juvenile commits a heinous crime, the State can exact forfeiture of some of the most basic liberties, but the State cannot extinguish his life and his potential to attain a mature understanding of his own humanity."
You might be interested in knowing something about the criminal that escalated this issue to the supreme court prior to deciding if you agree with Justice Kennedy's statement. Personally I think the murdering dirtball had already attained a full understanding of his own humanity, or lack thereof. According to variousarticles, 17 year old Simmons and an accomplice burglarized Shirley Crook's home. When Simmons found her in the home, he bound and gagged her, drove her to a railroad bridge and threw her off of it to her death. Simmons later bragged that he could get away with it because of his age. Thanks to Kennedy and his henchmen, it looks like Simmons was right.
Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the four Justices who was against overturning the death penalty laws lashed out against this decision and was quoted by CNN as writing that this was "no way to run a legal system" and:
"The court says in so many words that what our people's laws say about the issue does not, in the last analysis, matter"
"The court thus proclaims itself sole arbiter of our nation's moral standards"