My Photo
Name:
Location: California, United States

I am a neolibertarian minded individual who feels that freedom and individual rights take precedence over the wants of government. I believe government exists to serve the people and not to protect us from ourselves. I am an advocate for private firearms ownership, smaller government, reduced taxes and freedom to live your life however you choose, providing you do not directly hurt others.

Add to Google ReaderAdd to Bloglines
Add to FeedloungeAdd to Technorati
Add to netvibesAdd to My Yahoo
Add to My MSNAdd to Rojo
Add to NewsgatorAdd to My AOL
Subscribe to FeedAdd to Windows Live

Blogroll Me!


LestDarknessFall.com Libertarian Party (National) Libertarian Party of CA Constitution Party

Declaration of Independence

The U.S. Constitution

Bill of Rights

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report

2004 US DOJ Report Affirming 2nd Amendment Secures Right of Individuals


The Community for Life, Liberty and Property

The Life, Liberty, Property Blogroll

HOMESPUN BLOGGERS

Homespun Bloggers Blogroll


HOMESPUN BLOGGERS

American Flag League Blogroll



Blogs For Borders Blogroll


Screw the UN





Blogs That Link Here


Blogwise - blog directory Bloguniverse - blog directory

Haloscan -Comment Tools

Support this site by ordering great liberty themed books, movies and more! If you can't find what you want, click on the "Powered by Amazon" link in the lower right corner of my store and I'll get a referral fee for your Amazon.com purchases. You can also click this link to go directly to Amazon.com and have your purchases support this site.


Clicking on an item in these menus will take you to an article with that same title.

Self Defense/Foiled Crimes

Illegal Immigration Issues

Firearms/Ban Related Issues

Privacy Related Issues



Open the menu below and select a month and year to view archived posts for that month.




If you enjoy reading, you really must get one of these. I carry mine with me all of the time and read at least 5 books per month on it.




A Feast For Crows
This latest installment of Gearge R. R. Martin's "A Song of Fire and Ice" series isn't quite as gripping as the previous books but is still a pretty good read.


Phantom
Book 10 in the Sword of Truth series continues to keep the reader riveted while repeatedly emphasizing the duty and importance of self defense.


Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed
A follow up to Guns, Germs, and Steel that explains the geographic, environmental and socio-economic reasons that can cause civilizations and communities to collapse.

Mara Belly Dance Lessons Krav Maga Belly Dance
Return to p.i.e.

Sunday, October 23, 2005

Libertarian Myth #1

For lack of a more perfect fit, I describe myself in the blogger profile as a "libertarian minded individual". I often vote for Libertarian candidates and take the Libertarian side of most issues during political discussions. As a result, I am occasionally on the receiving end of anti-Libertarian comments. Since I usually hear the same few criticisms repeated, I am adding a new feature to this blog:

Libertarian Myths

This will be a somewhat regular series of posts examining and debunking commonly held myths about Libertarianism.

Today’s Libertarian myth:

Libertarians are pro-drugs
Not true. The Libertarian position is that tax dollars should not be seized from citizens for the purposes of arresting, trying and imprisoning people who use drugs. This does not mean that we support, like and/or encourage recreational drug use.

Here’s a quote from the National Libertarian Party’s web page on ending Prohibition:

Drug prohibition does more to make Americans unsafe than any other factor. Just as alcohol prohibition gave us Al Capone and the mafia, drug prohibition has given us the Crips, the Bloods and drive-by shootings. Consider the historical evidence: America's murder rate rose nearly 70% during alcohol prohibition, but returned to its previous levels after prohibition ended. Now, since the War on Drugs began, America's murder rates have doubled. The cause/effect relationship is clear. Prohibition is putting innocent lives at risk.

What's more, drug prohibition also inflates the cost of drugs, leading users to steal to support their high priced habits. It is estimated that drug addicts commit 25% of all auto thefts, 40% of robberies and assaults, and 50% of burglaries and larcenies. Prohibition puts your property at risk. Finally, nearly one half of all police resources are devoted to stopping drug trafficking, instead of preventing violent crime. The bottom line? By ending drug prohibition Libertarians would double the resources available for crime prevention, and significantly reduce the number of violent criminals at work in your neighborhood.

I’ve never used illegal drugs and have no interest in trying mind-altering substances. This is not because they are illegal nor is it because they are scarce. (On the contrary, when I was a student, such things were available for the asking.) If crack became legal tomorrow, I wouldn’t run to the nearest crack house to try some. Would you? Is the fact that such things are illegal really all that keeps people from frying their brains? I sincerely doubt it.

I personally don't care if an adult, in the privacy of their own home, smokes, injects sniffs and drinks as much as they like, providing they don't endanger anyone else or become an unwelcome burden on others. I wouldn’t respect them for it, but I also wouldn’t pay money to incarcerate them. If they drive while intoxicated, rob people to pay for their drugs or commit some other harm, they should be prosecuted and punished. If they show up for work intoxicated the employer should have the right to fire them. If they pickle their brains to the point where they can’t support or care for themselves, they either better hope a charity or relative takes them in or prepare to be declared legally incapacitated and spend their remaining days in an austere institution where they are fed basic nutrients and kept out everyone else’s hair.

As far as I’m concerned, doctors should be able to prescribe whatever they think will best meet a patient’s medical needs. After watching someone slowly die from cancer, I say ANYTHING that might help ease the pain and nausea should be fair game. Frankly, if a person is dying, what difference does it make if you give them morphine, heroine, marijuana, crack cocaine or whatever? If it eases their last few months of agony, it is probably a good thing. I don’t understand why it’s "good" to continuously shoot a patient full of morphine to the point where they fade in and out of consciousness, yet other ways of providing oblivion are “evil” and thus cannot be legally considered by the medical profession.

Labels: ,

|

<< Home